WHY IS BCS SO BORING?

Right off the bat, let me say that I'm a big fan of college football. I love the passion, the excitement, and the tradition. But there's one thing I can't stand about it: the Bowl Championship Series (BCS).

For those of you who don't know, the BCS is the system used to determine the two teams that play in the national championship game. It's a complicated system that takes into account a team's record, strength of schedule, and computer rankings. But it's also a system that's often criticized for being unfair and for not always producing the two best teams in the country.

There are a number of reasons why the BCS is so boring.

It's too predictable. The same teams seem to make it to the national championship game year after year. In the past 10 years, only four teams have won the national championship: Alabama, Florida, LSU, and Ohio State. That's not very exciting.

It's too focused on the regular season. The BCS doesn't take into account what happens in the bowl games. This means that a team can go undefeated in the regular season, but if they lose their bowl game, they won't make it to the national championship game. This is unfair to the teams that play in the bowl games. They deserve a chance to compete for the national championship just as much as the teams that don't.

It's too subjective. The BCS rankings are based on a number of factors, including a team's record, strength of schedule, and computer rankings. But these factors are all subjective. There's no one right way to measure a team's strength. This means that the BCS rankings can be very different from one week to the next. This makes it difficult for fans to follow and understand.

What can be done to fix the BCS?

There are a number of things that could be done to fix the BCS.

One is to make it more transparent. The BCS rankings should be based on a clear and objective set of criteria. This would make it easier for fans to understand how the rankings are determined.

Another is to give more weight to the bowl games. The bowl games are a big part of the college football season. They're a chance for teams to compete against each other in a neutral setting. The BCS should take the results of the bowl games into account when determining the two teams that play in the national championship game.

Finally, the BCS should be more inclusive. The current system only allows two teams to compete for the national championship. This is unfair to the other teams that have a chance to win it all. The BCS should be expanded to include more teams. This would make the national championship game more exciting and would give more teams a chance to compete for the title.

Conclusion

The BCS is a broken system. It's unfair, it's predictable, and it's boring. It's time for a change.

FAQs

• What is the BCS?
The BCS is the Bowl Championship Series, a system used to determine the two teams that play in the national championship game.

• Why is the BCS so boring?
The BCS is boring because it's too predictable, too focused on the regular season, and too subjective.

• What can be done to fix the BCS?
The BCS could be fixed by making it more transparent, giving more weight to the bowl games, and making it more inclusive.

• When was the BCS created?
The BCS was created in 1998.

• How many teams make it to the BCS National Championship Game?
Two teams make it to the BCS National Championship Game.